State ex rel. McKinney v. State

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that in light of the plain meaning of “insurance” and “insurer,” and the insurance title’s definition of “insurance,” a self-insured employer under the workers’ compensation laws was not an insurer for purposes of the guaranty act
• declining to construe “insurer” under Connecticut Insurance Guaranty Act [act] to include self-insurers in fight of legislature’s inclusion of self-insurer in definitions of insurers in other provisions of General Statutes and its omission of that term in act
• “jujnless there is evidence to the contrary, statutory itemization indicates that the legislature intended [a] list to be exclusive” [internal quotation marks omitted]

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).