State, Ex Rel. McHenry v. Calhoun

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• stating that “[ejxisting case law on the subject of mootness offers guidance concerning the circumstances under which the court will continue to dismiss moot claims” even when considering just prudential considerations
• noting that cases “in which a court’s decision no longer will have a practical effect on or concerning the rights of the parties will be dismissed as moot” (brackets and internal quotation marks omitted)
• noting that cases “in which a court’s decision no longer will have a practical effect on or concerning the rights of the parties will be dismissed as moot” (brackets and internal quotation marks omitted)
• remanding to the Court of Appeals to decide whether it should exercise its discretion to adjudicate the moot case after that court determined that the issues did not raise ORS 14.175 considerations
• after permit had expired and the appeal had become moot, the court determined whether the action was nevertheless justiciable under ORS 14.175
• case in which a court’s decision “no longer will have a practical effect on or concerning the rights of the parties” is moot

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).