State Ex Rel. McAmis Industries of Oregon, Inc. v. M. Cutter Co.

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• allowing supplemental answer where issues raised in the answer were fully and fairly litigated and no prejudice to the other party resulted
• mere possibility that federal court would have declined to exercise supplemental jurisdiction over claims did not excuse party from at least attempting to raise the claims in prior federal proceeding
• no waiver by acquiescence where “[p]laintiff, not defendants, chose dual forums for the litigation of its dispute with defendants” while defendants “assert [ed] all procedural and substantive arguments available to protect themselves from the risks posed by that decision”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).