State Ex Rel. Martin-Erb v. Missouri Commission on Human Rights

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that “section 536.150 gives [the complainant] the right to file a mandamus action to determine whether the executive director’s actions ‘were in fact accomplished under prescribed procedures and were lawful’ ”
• action for mandamus under § 536.150 was appropriate where employee made specific allegations regarding the MCHR’s failure to comply with its regulations in determining whether there was probable cause to believe that race discrimination had occurred
• ‘If [the employee] makes specific alle gations as to how the executive director failed to follow those rules, then section 536.150 gives her the right to file a mandamus action to determine whether the executive director’s actions “accomplished under prescribed procedures and were lawful’”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).