State ex rel. Marsh v. Serrott

Citations

• 2019 Ohio 622

Syllabus

Writ denied complaint dismissed. The magistrate noted that relator is not entitled to a writ of procedendo in this case for two reasons. First, his complaint seeks to compel the trial court to reach a desired outcome in the case, rather than merely proceed with the matter. Second, relator has subsequently obtained the desired outcome in trial court proceedings and a writ is unnecessary. In the absence of objections, and following our independent review of the matter, we find that the magistrate has properly determined the facts and applied the appropriate law.