Skip to main content
· 9/1/2006

State ex rel. Marcotte v. State

Citations

  • 936 So. 2d 196
  • 2006 La. LEXIS 2405
  • 2006 WL 2567016

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • listing cases and applying minority position of not requiring expert testimony
  • discussing difference between notice required under 4-177 (b)(4) and 4-182 (c)
  • ‘‘due process requires that the notice given must . . . fairly indicate the legal theory under which such facts are claimed to constitute a violation of the law’’ (internal quotation marks omitted)
  • appeal from the decisions by the defendant board suspending the plaintiffs' chiropractic licenses
  • this principle is “keystone of administrative appeals”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.