State ex rel. Mann v. Anderson

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding trial court did not abuse its discretion in empowering receiver to perform actions specifically enumerated in R.C. 2735.04
• finding that substantial compliance was not demonstrated where record was replete with examples of party's noncompliance
• rejecting the contemnor's argument that he substantially complied with the order at issue
• “This court will not reverse the decision of the court below in a contempt proceeding in the absence of a showing of an abuse of discretion.”
• “It naturally follows that Gibbs would have to demonstrate that the trial court abused its discretion when it empowered the receiver to collect rents.”
• \ We interpret this statute as enabling the trial court to exercise its sound judicial discretion to limit or expand a receiver's powers as it deems appropriate.\

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).