State ex rel. Main v. Omodt

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• finding K.S.A. 60-1507 provides the exclusive statutory remedy to collaterally attack a criminal conviction and sentence
• change in law applies to cases pending on direct review and not yet final on date of appellate court decision
• change in the law acts prospectively, applying “ ⅛ all cases . . . pending on direct review or not yet final’ ”
• change in caselaw acts prospectively, applying “ ‘to all cases . . . pending on direct review or not yet final’ ”
• change in the law acts prospectively, applying \'to all cases . . . pending on direct review or not yet final'\
• criminal defendant could not rely on K.S.A. 2012 Supp. 60-260(b)—a statute authorizing relief from a final judgment or order in a civil action—to mount collateral attack on convictions and sentence

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).