State ex rel. Madlock v. O'Malley

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• finding that a request for employment records that is not limited in time and scope should be denied
• request for “any and all information ... concerning [a person’s] employment is too broad”
• “[Discovery relevant to impeachment must be no more intrusive than necessary ... ”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Cited by

6 cases in this archive cite this case.

• Hancock v. Shook
  Supreme Court of Missouri· 2003-03-18· cited 87×
• State Ex Rel. Ford Motor Co. v. Messina
  Supreme Court of Missouri· 2002-04-09· cited 52×
• State Ex Rel. Delmar Gardens North Operating, LLC v. Gaertner
  Supreme Court of Missouri· 2007-12-04· cited 18×
• State Ex Rel. Ford Motor Co. v. Westbrooke
  Supreme Court of Missouri· 2004-11-23· cited 17×
• State ex rel. BNSF Railway Co. v. Neill
  Supreme Court of Missouri· 2011-12-20· cited 12×
• State ex rel. Chance v. Sweeney
  Missouri Court of Appeals· 2002-03-28· cited 9×

Cites

3 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

• State Ex Rel. Stecher v. Dowd
  Supreme Court of Missouri· 1995-12-19· cited 30×
• State Ex Rel. Jones v. Syler
  Supreme Court of Missouri· 1997-01-21· cited 19×
• State ex rel. Tally v. Grimm
  Supreme Court of Missouri· 1987-01-13· cited 6×