State ex rel. Long v. Hamilton Cty. Coroner (Slip Opinion)

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that timetables were restarted when the changes to the judgment did not indicate that they were made to enlarge the time to appeal
• holding that evidence of financial difficulties, unstable living conditions, and little or no support system favored the jury’s finding that termination was in child’s best interest
• holding that court of appeals erred in taking judicial notice of expert testimony from other proceeding because the testimony did not satisfy the requirements of Rule 201
• recognizing the fact finder is the “sole arbiter when assessing the credibility and demeanor of witnesses”
• stating that parent must have committed only one of the acts prohibited under family code section 161.001(1) for termination of her parental rights
• stating that parent must have committed only one of the acts prohibited under family code section 161.001(1) for termination of her parental rights

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).