State ex rel. Liles v. O'Dwyer

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• recognizing that exclusive dealing arrangements “may actually enhance competition,” so “they are not deemed per se illegal”
• “Conspiring to monopolize is a separate offense under section 2, requiring less in the way of proof than the other section 2 offenses.”
• reversing district court’s dismissal of an antitrust conspiracy claim where the “conduct complained of—termination of the distributorship—is adequately specified, and the allegation of conspiracy related to that conduct”
• “[A] complaining trader [challenging an exclusive-dealing arrangement] must allege and prove that a particular arrangement unreasonably restricts the opportunities of the seller‟s competitors to market their product.”
• “question is whether the notice of appeal and subsequent appellate proceedings support the inference that at the time of filing the notice, [cross] appellant sought to appeal the unspecified order”
• amended complaint charging conspiracy to violate antitrust laws sufficient to give fair notice of basis of claim

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).