State ex rel. Laugand v. State

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• construing identical language in two Practice Book provisions in the same manner
• construing identical language in two Practice Book provisions in the same manner
• where party had one opportunity to be heard, due process was not violated “by the application of a procedural rule [that] deems a party to have consented to a motion because of her failure to meet the requirement of the rule regarding timely filing” of opposition papers

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).