State Ex Rel. LaSota v. Corcoran

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• distinguishing Harrison based on fact that evidence which allegedly impelled defendant to testify was improperly introduced, not illegally obtained
• “[‘F]ormer testimony’ must also meet the tests of relevancy and absence of overriding prejudice.”
• \[`F]ormer testimony' must also meet the tests of relevancy and absence of overriding prejudice.\

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).