State ex rel. Klein v. Second Judicial District Court

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• refusing to hear procedural due process claim because the lower court had no opportunity to consider the claim
• because “there is ordinarily no constitutional right to judicial review of administrative action,” court lacks such jurisdiction if no statutory authorization
• commission meeting not a hearing within purview of General Statutes § 4-166 [2]; therefore not a contested case
• ‘‘[o]ur cases consistently recognize the gen- erally adversarial nature of a proceeding considered a ‘hearing,’ in which witnesses are heard and testimony is taken’’
• no contested case when state employees’ retirement commission did not hold hearing on request to change retirement plans and was not required by statute to hold hearing
• under the UAPA, a hearing is generally an adversarial proceeding where witnesses are heard and testimony is given

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).