Skip to main content
· 10/7/2014

State ex rel. Keith v. Ohio Adult Parole Auth. (Slip Opinion)

Citations

  • 2014 Ohio 4270
  • 141 Ohio St. 3d 375
  • 24 N.E.3d 1132

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • “[T]he OAPA may not rely on information that it knows or has reason to know is inaccurate.”
  • “[I]n any parole determination involving indeterminate sentencing, the [parole board] may not rely on information that it knows or has reason to know is inaccurate.”
  • OAPA not require to “credit every unsupported allegation by a prisoner that the information is inaccurate.”
  • Keith pointed out a memo from ODRC stating he had been incarcerated during a time period when another ODRC memo states he was permitted to remain on supervision during that same time and that ODRC believed he had been paroled eight times when it was six times.

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Lanzinger, O'Connor, Pfeifer, Kennedy, French, O'Neill, O'Donnell

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.