State Ex Rel. Kauble v. Hartenbach

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• “Because there is no party to this proceeding that maintains the registry, this Court cannot grant Kauble’s requested relief ordering that his name be removed from the registry.”
• our Missouri Supreme Court adopted the holding in Ortega that when a defendant has been discharged from probation, without a criminal conviction, the trial court loses authority to alter or amend its previous decision under Rule 29.07(d)
• our Missouri Supreme Court adopted the holding in Ortega that when a defendant has been discharged from probation, without a criminal conviction, the trial court loses authority to alter or amend its previous decision under Rule 29.07(d)

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).