State ex rel. Kaminski v. Indus. Comm.

Citations

• 2025 Ohio 4663

Syllabus

Relator did not demonstrate entitlement to a writ of mandamus ordering the Industrial Commission to approve his request for permanent total disability compensation. The commission considered all the evidence before it and determined, based on medical evidence and consideration of the nonmedical factors, that relator was not permanently and totally disabled. Because the commission had some evidence upon which to rely, specifically identified the evidence upon which it relied, and provided a brief explanation for its reasoning, the commission did not abuse its discretion in denying relator's application for permanent total disability compensation. Writ of mandamus denied