State Ex Rel. Juvenile Department v. Vanbuskirk

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• reasoning that the “key inquiry in determining whether £condition[s] or circumstances’ warrant jurisdiction is whether, under the totality of the circumstances, there is a reasonable likelihood of harm to the welfare of the child”
• reasoning that the ‘key inquiry in determining whether “condition[s] or circumstances” warrant jurisdiction is whether, under the totality of the circumstances, there is a reasonable likelihood of harm to the welfare of the child’
• explaining that, in deciding whether a condition or circumstances endanger the welfare of a child, the dispositive question “is whether, under the totality of the circumstances, there is a reasonable likelihood of harm to the welfare of the child”
• jurisdiction under ORS 419B.100(1)(c) is warranted if “there is a reasonable likelihood of harm” to the child
• “The key inquiry in determining whether ‘condition or circumstances’ warrant jurisdiction is whether, under the totality of the circumstances, there is a reasonable likelihood of harm to the welfare of the child.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).