State Ex Rel. Juvenile Department v. Holloway

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• “[M]ere presence at a crime is insufficient to establish aiding and abetting. Similarly, 1 If the “total value of the property * * * is $100 or more and less than $1000,” the conduct constitutes second-degree theft. ORS 164.045(1)(b
• “[M]ere presence at a crime is insufficient to establish aiding and abetting. Similarly, acquiescence alone 1 If the “total value of the property * * * is $100 or more and less than $1000,” the conduct constitutes second-degree theft. ORS 164.045(1)(b
• “[M]ere presence at a crime is insufficient to establish aiding and abetting. Similarly, 1 If the “total value of the property * * * is $100 or more and less than $1000,” the conduct constitutes second-degree theft. ORS 164.045(1)(b). Nonprecedential Memo Op: 342 Or App 835 (2025

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).