State Ex Rel. Juvenile Department v. Clements

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• the child in a juvenile delinquency case did not adequately waive his right to a trial where the court failed to inform him that the state would be required at trial to establish his guilt beyond a reasonable doubt
• “[A] juvenile faced with allegations that could result in confinement is entitled to the same procedural safeguards as an adult, so long as those procedures do not impede the purposes for which the juvenile system was designed.”
• the child in a juvenile delinquency case did not adequately waive his right to a trial where the court failed to inform him that the state would be required at trial to establish his guilt beyond a reasonable doubt

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).