State Ex Rel. Juvenile Department v. Charles

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that social workers with more than normal experience but without specialized tribal and cultural knowledge were unqualified under the ICWA
• holding that emergency removal of a child is initially purely a state law matter not subject to all ICWA requirements
• holding that social workers with more than normal experience but without specialized tribal and cultural knowledge were unqualified under the ICWA
• finding that the purpose of § 1912(d) is to require an affirmative showing by the state that active efforts to reunite the family had failed
• finding that the purpose of § 1912(d) is to require an affirmative showing by the State that active efforts to reunite the family had failed
• finding that the purpose of § 1912(d) is to require an affirmative showing by the state that active efforts to reunite the family had failed

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).