State Ex Rel. Juv. Dept. v. SA

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• accepting the state's concession that dependency petitions must allege a current risk to the child's welfare
• accepting the state’s concession that dependency petitions must allege a current risk to the child’s welfare
• accepting the state’s concession that an allegation that failed to address current danger to the child was facially invalid
• an allegation that the father had “a history of substance abuse, which if active, would endanger the welfare of the child” was insufficient
• in dependency petitions, as the state conceded, the agency must allege a current risk of harm
• in dependency petitions, as the state conceded, the agency must allege a current risk of harm

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).