State ex rel. Jones v. Hoying

Citations

• 2025 Ohio 468

Syllabus

The magistrate's decision contained no error of law or other defect on its face. Therefore, we adopt as our own the magistrate's decision finding that there is insufficient evidence in the record to support the parole board hearing officer's finding that relator committed three separate counts of violating Rule 1 of the terms of his postrelease control, and that viewing the evidence in a light most favorable to the APA, no rational trier of fact could find the postrelease control violations proven by a preponderance of the evidence. Accordingly, relator's request for a writ of mandamus is granted.