Skip to main content
· 4/10/1909

State ex rel. Jackson v. Harsha

Citations

  • 80 Kan. 72
  • 101 P. 454
  • 1909 Kan. LEXIS 13

Syllabus

<p>SYLLABUS BY THE COURT.</p> <p>Election Statutes — Amendment Inapplicable for Lack of Time —Applicability of Repealed Law — Presumption. Where an amendatory statute providing for a primary election of candidates is temporarily inapplicable by reason of insufficient time for its operation, and the repealed provisions of the amended statute provide an applicable method of nominating such candidates, it will be presumed that the legislature did not intend the amendment or the repeal to take effect as to such nominations. In such case the former provisions for nominations by petition remain in force until the amendment becomes applicable. '</p>

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • applying corporation by estoppel after assuming, but not concluding, the corporation was de jure

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Smith

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.