State ex rel. Industrial Commission v. Harlan

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that “[a]t no time was any investigation or interrogation commenced against appellant,” the LEBOR was inapplicable
• “[T]he LEOBR is intended to provide a police officer due process protection ... when the officer is investigated and/or interrogated as a result of a disciplinary-type complaint lodged against the officer”
• reassignment of drug unit officers based on results of polygraph examinations not punitive in nature
• “[T]he LEOBR is intended to provide a police officer due process protection ... when the officer is investigated and/or interrogated as a result of a disciplinary-type complaint lodged against the officer”
• annual polygraph examinations not an investigation

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).