Skip to main content
· 12/30/1982

State Ex Rel. Hydraulic Servocontrols Corp. v. Dale

Citations

  • 657 P.2d 211
  • 294 Or. 381
  • 1982 Ore. LEXIS 1338

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • relevant due process consideration is the foreseeability of being haled into the forum state’s courts that derives from defendant’s conduct and connection with the forum state
  • where the plaintiff alleges facts bringing his or her case within a specific provision of ORCP 4B through K, jurisdiction will be found; lacking such facts, court will consider application of ORCP 4L
  • “[B]ecause California’s long- arm statute is coextensive with the limits of due process, the two inquiries collapse into a single inquiry: whether jurisdiction comports with due process.”
  • finding jurisdiction under almost identical facts

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Lent, Linde, Peterson, Campbell, Roberts, Carson

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.