State ex rel. Huston v. Commissioners

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• “In the United States [the writ] has always been issued in the name of the sovereignty by which it has been authorized. * * * From the nature of the remedy, this suit, then, is properly prosecuted in the name of the State.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Cited by

15 cases in this archive cite this case.

• Irvin v. Gregory
  Supreme Court of Georgia· 1891-02-07· cited 40×
• State Ex Rel. Allen v. Ferguson
  Ohio Supreme Court· 1951-03-07· cited 37×
• State ex rel. Weinberg v. Pacific Brewing & Malting Co.
  Washington Supreme Court· 1899-09-27· cited 29×
• Bundy v. State
  Ohio Supreme Court· 2015-06-04· cited 15×
• State v. Hipp
  Ohio Supreme Court· 1882-01-15
• State v. Frame
  Ohio Supreme Court· 1883-01-15
• State v. Sinks
  Ohio Supreme Court· 1884-10-28
• State v. Pugh
  Ohio Supreme Court· 1885-01-15
• State ex rel. Allison v. Garver
  Ohio Supreme Court· 1902-06-24
• State ex rel. Crenshaw v. Maple Hts. Police Dept.
  Ohio Court of Appeals· 2022-11-03
• Granger v. Knipper
  Ohio Superior Court, Cincinnati· 1873-04-15
• State ex rel. Allison v. Garver
  Holmes Circuit Court· 1901-11-15
• Van Cleve Glass Co. v. Wamelink
  Cuyahoga County Common Pleas Court· 1897-10-11
• Moir v. The Dubuque
  E.D. Michigan· 1871-01-17
• In re the Assignment of Roberg & Co.
  Ohio Circuit Courts· 1899-01-15