Skip to main content
· 5/2/2008

State ex rel. Hughes v. State

Citations

  • 979 So. 2d 1278
  • 2008 La. LEXIS 1022
  • 2008 WL 1986180

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • holding that, for purposes of harmfulness analysis, trial court’s improper failure to provide jury with special credibility instruc- tion for witness who was jailhouse informant was not constitutional in nature
  • reversing judgment where trial court declined to instruct jury regarding credibility of jailhouse informant who had been promised benefit in exchange for his tes- timony
  • describing additional jury cautions necessary when accomplice or complaining witness testifies
  • defendant was entitled to instruction “substantially in accord with the one that he had sought”
  • trial court is required to give special credibility instruction for jail-house informant who has been promised benefit in exchange for testimony
  • trial court is required to give special credibility instruction for jailhouse informant who has been promised benefit in exchange for testimony

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.