Skip to main content
· 2/15/2005

State Ex Rel. Howenstine v. Roper

Citations

  • 155 S.W.3d 747
  • 2005 Mo. LEXIS 15
  • 2005 WL 351374

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • stating that the public duty doctrine shields employees and the governmental bodies that employ them from liability
  • a state regulation requiring a doctor to supervise services rendered at a clinic, pursuant to a “collaborative practice arrangement,” did not impose a ministerial duty
  • medical director’s “acts to improve the operations, treatment and training at the clinic were for the public at large and not specifically for [the individual patient].”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Price

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.