State ex rel. Holden v. Swift

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• recognizing that the First Amendment rights of public school students \are not automatically coextensive with the rights of adults in other settings\
• recognizing that the First Amendment rights of public school students “are not automatically coextensive with the rights of adults in other settings”
• holding that student’s First Amendment rights were not violated when officials suspended him for making a sexually suggestive speech at a high school assembly
• holding that professor had no First Amendment right to use profane language in the classroom
• holding that the school district permissibly sanctioned a student for his sexually explicit speech at a school assembly
• holding that a sexually suggestive student government speech was not protected by First Amendment free speech and expression rights

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).