Skip to main content
· 11/2/2007

State ex rel. Hodge v. State

Citations

  • 966 So. 2d 596
  • 2007 La. LEXIS 2429
  • 2007 WL 3286723

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • decision to grant evidentiary hearing in order to determine defendant's competence requires \exercise of sound judicial discretion\ [internal quotation marks omitted]
  • decision to grant evidentiary hearing in order to determine defendant’s competence requires “exercise of sound judicial discretion” [internal quotation marks omitted]
  • trial court did not abuse its discretion in concluding that probative value of uncharged sexual misconduct evidence outweighed its prejudicial effect, even though charged conduct involved greater degree of force
  • “such evidence [cannot] be used to suggest that the defendant has a bad character or a propensity for criminal behavior”
  • “[pjersons are presumed to be aware of the law and cannot plead ignorance”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.