Skip to main content
· 12/4/1961

State Ex Rel. Herman and Roy v. Powell

Citations

  • 367 P.2d 553
  • 139 Mont. 583
  • 1961 Mont. LEXIS 93

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • finding that the Board has no right to extinguish a sentence by paroling an individual on a subsequent sentence
  • finding that the Board has no right to extinguish a sentence by paroling an individual on a subsequent sentence
  • the Montana statute which requires an escape sentence to run consecutive to the original sentence does not require that an inmate who escapes must serve his entire original sentence in prison plus his escape sentence before being considered for parole
  • the Montana statute which requires an escape sentence to run consecutive to the original sentence does not require that an inmate who escapes must serve his entire original sentence in prison plus his escape sentence before being considered for parole

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Harrison, Adair, Castles, Doyle

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.