Skip to main content
Federal & State Lawfederalstatelaw.com
Home/Federal/Cases
Ohio Supreme Court· 11/10/1998

State ex rel. Herdman v. Watson

Citations

  • 83 Ohio St. 3d 537
  • 700 N.E.2d 1270

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • holding that an appeal following the entry of a final, appealable order constitutes an adequate legal remedy to resolve any alleged error by the trial court in its pretrial discovery orders
  • prohibition did not lie when relator, a nonparty to a civil case, alleged that court’s discovery orders violated Fifth Amendment, attorney-client, and physician-patient privileges; trial court had jurisdiction to decide those issues

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Cook, Douglas, Moyer, Pfeifer, Resnick, Stratton, Sweeney

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

11 cases in this archive cite this case.

Cites

7 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

Other cases named State ex rel. Herdman v. Watson

1 other CourtListener record shares this case name.

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.