State Ex Rel. Hayter v. Griffin

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• finding the defendant did not put his medical condition at issue by responding to deposition questions and invoking comparative negligence as a defense
• medical examination for purposes of satisfying federal regulations not within the scope of physician-patient privilege because privilege extends only to information acquired by physician for purposes of prescribing and treatment
• medical examination for purposes of satisfying federal regulations not within the scope of physician-patient privilege because privilege extends only to information acquired by physician for purposes of prescribing and treatment
• medical examination for purposes of satisfying federal regulations not within the scope of physician-patient privilege - 18 - because privilege extends only to information acquired by physician for purposes of prescribing and treatment

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).