State ex rel. Haydocy v. Ohio Pub. Emps. Retirement Sys.

Citations

• 2026 Ohio 1928

Syllabus

Mandamus—Former state employee failed to demonstrate either that he has a clear legal right to a writ compelling Ohio Public Employees Retirement System (\OPERS\) to process his request to transfer his OPERS-held funds to his deferred-compensation plan in absence of notarized consent form or that OPERS has a clear legal duty to provide that relief—Adm.Code 145-2-67(A) permits Public Employees Retirement Board to prescribe time and manner of rollover distributions—State ex rel. Davis v. Pub. Emps. Retirement Bd. (10th Dist.) distinguished—Court of appeals' judgment granting OPERS's motion to dismiss affirmed.