State Ex Rel. Hatcher v. McBride

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that “[a] skeletal ‘argument,’ really nothing more than an assertion, does not preserve a claim[.]”
• stating that “[h]istorically, this Court has declined to intervene in cases where judicially-imposed sentences are within legislatively prescribed limits.”
• cautioning that “[a] skeletal ‘argument,’ really nothing more than an assertion, does not preserve a claim”
• stating that “a skeletal ‘argument,’ really nothing more than an assertion, does not preserve a claim”
• denying habeas relief on claim of ineffective assistance of habeas counsel and other claims
• upholding a 212-year sentence for one count 5 of first-degree robbery

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).