Skip to main content
· 5/21/2002

State Ex Rel. Hatch v. Employers Insurance of Wausau

Citations

  • 644 N.W.2d 820
  • 2002 Minn. App. LEXIS 609
  • 2002 WL 1050494

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • stating that federal caselaw interpreting MERLA is persuasive but not binding on this court

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Hanson, Schumacher, Poritsky

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.