State ex rel. Harvey v. Manning

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• noting that although discovery rule applied to toll statute of limitations, proponent of recovered memory still bore burden to validate phenomenon of memory repression itself and admissibility of evidence flowing therefrom
• noting that although discovery rule applied to toll statute of limitations, proponent of recovered memory still bore burden to validate phenomenon of memory repression itself and admissibility of evidence flowing therefrom
• noting that although discovery rule applied to toll statute of limitations, the proponent of recovered memory still bore “the burden ... to validate the phenomenon of memory repression itself and the admissibility of evidence flowing therefrom”
• guoting Heath v. Sears, Roebuck & C o ., 123 N.H. 512, 523-24, 464 A.2d 288, 294 (1983)
• issue decided on discovery rule grounds; therefore, court need not address fraudulent concealment argument
• although “arise” and “accrue” are not synonymous, “these two events often occur simultaneously”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).