State ex rel. Hart v. MC Cray

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• recognizing that “[o]nly one predicate finding under [S]ection 161.001[(b)](1) is necessary to support a judgment of termination”
• recognizing that “[o]nly one predicate finding under section 161.001[(b)](1) is necessary to support a judgment of termination”
• recognizing that a single predicate finding is sufficient to support termination when there is also a finding that termination is in the child’s best interest
• recognizing that a single predicate finding is sufficient to support termination that is in the child’s best interest
• holding that only one predicate finding under section 161.001(1) is necessary to support judgment of termination
• holding that only one predicate finding is necessary to support termination judgment when there is also finding that termination is in child’s best interest

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).