State ex rel. Harrison v. Frazier

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that arbitrator could include interest in award where parties’ arbitration agreement was silent on issue of interest
• concluding that arbitrator committed plain mistake when, due to “an error of law,” arbitrator denied plaintiff interest on an award
• reversing arbitrator who did not award interest when the parties’ arbitration agreement did not contain a provision for the payment of interest on damages because we concluded that, given the “broad language” of the agreement, “the arbitrator could have awarded interest”
• “It is proper to presume that the legislature was aware of the difference between . . . words and chose to use them advisedly . . . .”
• “An arbitrator’s jurisdiction over an issue depends upon the voluntary agreement of the parties.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).