State ex rel. Harris v. Rothgery
Citations
- 2026 Ohio 578
Syllabus
Mandamus—Prohibition—Appellee-trial judge did not patently and unambiguously lack jurisdiction to sentence appellant or to issue nunc pro tunc order, and appellant had adequate remedies in ordinary course of law to challenge sentencing entry—A trial court does not patently and unambiguously lack jurisdiction to correct a judgment entry by issuing a nunc pro tunc order under Crim.R. 36 while an appeal from the judgment is pending—Court of appeals' judgment granting appellee's motion to dismiss affirmed.
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.