Skip to main content
· 2/24/2026

State ex rel. Harris v. Rothgery

Citations

  • 2026 Ohio 578

Syllabus

Mandamus—Prohibition—Appellee-trial judge did not patently and unambiguously lack jurisdiction to sentence appellant or to issue nunc pro tunc order, and appellant had adequate remedies in ordinary course of law to challenge sentencing entry—A trial court does not patently and unambiguously lack jurisdiction to correct a judgment entry by issuing a nunc pro tunc order under Crim.R. 36 while an appeal from the judgment is pending—Court of appeals' judgment granting appellee's motion to dismiss affirmed.

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.