Skip to main content
· 2/8/1918

State ex rel. Hackett v. Arnest

Citations

  • 100 Wash. 286
  • 170 P. 563
  • 1918 Wash. LEXIS 721

Syllabus

<p>Mandamus — Proceedings — Service. Under Rem. Code, § 1025, providing that a writ of mandamus must be served in the same manner as a summons in a civil action, the copy of the writ need not be certified.</p> <p>Same—Proceedings-—-Defects. Incorrectly dating a writ of mandamus is immaterial, where the return day was correctly set out and the defendant could not have been misled.</p> <p>Same—Scope of Inquiry-—-Merits of Appeal. Upon application for a writ of mandamus in aid of appellate jurisdiction to compel a justice to certify a transcript of the proceedings, the merits of the appeal should not be tried out.</p> <p>Same—-To Courts—Compelling Transcript on Appeal. Upon appeal from a police court in a criminal proceeding, the duty to certify and transmit a transcript of the proceedings to the superior court is a purely ministerial act, which may be compelled by writ of mandate.</p>

Judges: Chadwick, Ellis, Holcomb, Morris, Mount

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.