State ex rel. Gwiazda v. Indus. Comm.

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• stating that we reverse sua sponte only sparingly and only when exceptional circumstances exist and the parties have obtained an opportunity to address the issue
• stating that we reverse sua sponte only sparingly and only when exceptional circumstances exist and the parties have obtained an opportunity to address the issue
• stating that we ordinarily confine ourselves to the appellant’s arguments for reversal
• federal money-laundering statute is only violated if the “transaction generating the criminally derived proceeds is distinct from the money- laundering transaction”
• “We ordinarily consider only the grounds presented by the appellant, wary of searching out our own reasons to reverse when the ground is not presented by the appellant[.]”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).