State ex rel. Group Mgt. Servs., Inc. v. Indus. Comm.
Citations
- 2023 Ohio 4555
Syllabus
Objections sustained and writ of mandamus denied. Hearing officer properly relied on medical report as \some evidence\ to grant the compensation award. Despite mistaken reference to administrative materials, doctor still made the separate findings required under State ex rel. Rodriguez v. Indus. Comm., 10th Dist. No. 08AP-910, 2009-Ohio-4834 to support SHO's determination of total loss of use of claimant's thumb.
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- noting that “the prior art outlined in [§] 102 [] supplies the evidence of obviousness”
- “When the 102(e) reference patentee [’712] ... had knowledge of the joint applicants’ invention [’313] by being one of them, and thereafter describes it, he necessarily files the application after the [’313] applicant’s invention date....”
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Edelstein
Read full opinion on CourtListenerSourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.