State ex rel. Grant v. Collins

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that “[a] district court should dismiss where it appears certain that the plaintiff cannot prove a plausible set of facts that establish subject-matter jurisdiction”
• recognizing that the agency rejected the argument that the “ALJ was unconstitutionally appointed”
• recognizing that the agency rejected the argument that the “ALJ was unconstitutionally appointed”
• stating that the Bank’s constitutional claims “turned largely on why the agency brought charges”—i.e., the equal protection claim—“and on how the hearing was conducted”—i.e., the due process claim
• stating that the Bank’s constitutional claims “turned largely on why the agency brought charges”—i.e., the equal protection claim—“and on how the hearing was conducted”—i.e., the due process claim
• explaining that some circuit courts have suggested this approach though none have adopted it

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).