Skip to main content
· 5/16/2012

State ex rel. G.E.

Citations

  • 94 So. 3d 863
  • 2011 La.App. 4 Cir. 1558
  • 2012 WL 1744176
  • 2012 La. App. LEXIS 674

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • holding that the defendant was not prejudiced by the state’s ability to impeach a witness with her prior inconsistent statement under the amended date

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Jones, Landrieu, Lobrano

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.