· 1/19/1923
State ex rel. Gaylord v. Herdman
Citations
- 17 Ohio App. 269
- 35 Ohio C.C. Dec. 849
- 32 Ohio C.C. (n.s.) 558
- 1923 Ohio App. LEXIS 280
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- noting that “[a] ‘mutuality of interest, including an identity of desired result,’ might also support a finding of privity”
- noting that “[a] ‘mutuality of interest, including an identity of desired result,’ might also support a finding of privity”
- explaining virtually identical concepts under federal law
- claim preclusion requires privity of parties
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Funk, Pardee, Washburn
Read full opinion on CourtListenerSourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.