State Ex Rel. Gardner v. Holm

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• stating that “the language of the provision itself is the best evidence of the intention of the framers of the constitution”
• stating that when construing the Constitution, our court gives ordinary meaning to the words used
• noting, based on the plain language of the constitution, that “the governor clearly has the-right to veto any- bill appropriating money”
• “[W]here the language used is clear, explicit, and unambiguous ... and free from obscurity, the courts must give it the-ordinary, meaning of the words used.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).