Skip to main content
· 6/13/1996

State Ex Rel. Forbes v. Canady

Citations

  • 475 S.E.2d 37
  • 197 W. Va. 37
  • 1996 W. Va. LEXIS 70

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • “Although the State does not have the ability to appeal the dismissal of an indictment when it is not bad or insufficient, we recognize that the State is armed with another right of appellate review in the form of prohibition.”
  • Rule 8(a) “compels the prosecuting attorney to charge in the same charging document all offenses based on ... constituting parts of a common scheme or plan, whether felonies, misdemeanors or both, provided that the offenses occurred in the same jurisdiction. ...”
  • “Although the State does not have the ability to appeal the dismissal of an indictment when it is not bad or insufficient, we recognize that ,the State is armed with another right of appellate review-in the form of prohibition.”
  • “Although the State does not have the ability to appeal the dismissal of an indictment when it is not bad or insufficient, we recognize that the State is armed with another right of appellate review in the form of prohibition.”
  • “Although the State does not have the ability to appeal the dismissal of an indictment when it is not bad or insufficient, we recognize that the State is armed with another right of appellate review in the form of prohibition.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Recht

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.