· 4/2/2004
State ex rel. Farcy v. State
Citations
- 869 So. 2d 870
- 2004 La. LEXIS 1140
- 2004 WL 905771
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- explaining that “[t]he obvious reason for the distinction between our burglary and breaking and entering statutes is the intent of the general assembly to punish burglary more severely because it involves entering a place where people, as opposed to mere property, are likely to be”
- burglary involves entering a place where people, as opposed to mere property, are likely to be
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Weimer
Read full opinion on CourtListenerSourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.