Skip to main content
· 4/2/2004

State ex rel. Farcy v. State

Citations

  • 869 So. 2d 870
  • 2004 La. LEXIS 1140
  • 2004 WL 905771

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • explaining that “[t]he obvious reason for the distinction between our burglary and breaking and entering statutes is the intent of the general assembly to punish burglary more severely because it involves entering a place where people, as opposed to mere property, are likely to be”
  • burglary involves entering a place where people, as opposed to mere property, are likely to be

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Weimer

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.